MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406847710 · doi:10.1002/art.43127

Proinflammatory Dietary Pattern and the Risk of Female Gout: Sex‐Specific Findings From Three Prospective Cohort Studies

2025· article· en· W4406847710 on OpenAlexafffund
Hyon K. Choi, Na Lu, Chio Yokose, Kehuan Lin, Dong Hoon Lee, Fred K. Tabung, Natalie McCormick

Bibliographic record

VenueArthritis & Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid
Canadian institutionsResearch Canada
FundersNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesNational Cancer InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioGoutProspective cohort studyProportional hazards modelInternal medicineConfidence intervalCohort studyCohortDashWomen's Health InitiativeDemographyObservational study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine whether a proinflammatory dietary pattern (mechanism-based diet) is associated with incident female gout in two large cohorts of US women. METHODS: We prospectively observed 79,104 women from the Nurses' Health Study (1984-2016) and 94,382 women from the Nurses' Health Study II (1991-2017); 45,445 men from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986-2016) served as a comparison cohort. Validated food frequency questionnaires were used to calculate Empirical Dietary Inflammatory Pattern (EDIP) (food-based index predictive of circulating inflammatory biomarkers) scores every four years. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate multivariable associations between EDIP and incident, physician-diagnosed gout. We further tested whether these associations were independent of key guideline-based healthy eating patterns that previously showed beneficial associations with gout (ie, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension [DASH], Alternative Healthy Eating Index [AHEI]). RESULTS: We documented 5,425 incident female gout cases over 4,372,243 person-years. EDIP was positively associated with female gout risk; hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the most versus least proinflammatory quintile was 2.02 (1.83-2.22). Additional adjustment for body mass index attenuated this association (HR 1.71 [95% CI 1.55-1.88]). Reversing the EDIP score, women in the most anti-inflammatory EDIP quintile had the largest magnitude of protective association for gout (HR 0.58 [95% CI 0.53-0.65]) compared with HRs for healthiest DASH (HR 0.80 [95% CI 0.73-0.87]) and AHEI quintiles (HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.74-0.89]). The magnitude of association between EDIP and male gout was substantially smaller (HR 1.24 [95% CI 1.13-1.37]; P-heterogeneity <0.0001). CONCLUSION: These findings support a pivotal role of inflammation as a potential modulator between diet and gout onset, particularly among women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthritis & RheumatologySame topicGout, Hyperuricemia, Uric AcidFrench-language works237,207