Freeze-thaw damage assessment of internally insulated historic brick masonry walls under a changing climate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preserving the cultural significance of historic buildings while improving their energy efficiency may seem contradictory. For instance, to maintain the original façade of historic buildings it is not possible to add thermal insulation to the exterior walls. Alternative measures such as applying insulation to the wall interior need to be considered. However, such measures are considered one of the most difficult retrofit solutions for historic buildings. Research suggests that introducing internal insulation in historic masonry walls amidst varying climate conditions poses potential challenges in controlling moisture and maintaining the integrity of the masonry structure. It is therefore crucial to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the possible risks linked to moisture-related issues such as freeze-thaw (FT) damage to masonry walls. This study provides recommendations for enhancing the energy efficiency of older historic buildings without compromising their cultural significance and long-term durability by examining methods for internal insulation. The hygrothermal behavior of historical masonry walls was investigated before and after retrofitting in response to historical and future climates. Ottawa was selected as the study location to conduct the analysis. The investigation included various factors such as the local climate conditions, building height/size, as well as brick and insulation material properties. Hygrothermal simulations over a 31-year period were performed to predict the risk of FT damage. This study provides a decision-making procedure for retrofit projects of historic masonry buildings requiring internal insulation and suggests solutions in situations where caution is required. • Freeze-thaw damage risk of historic brick walls with interior insulation was investigated. • Variables include WDR exposure, orientations, brick types, insulation types and thickness. • A decision-making procedure for safely insulating historic brick walls is proposed. • Solutions for safely insulating historic brick walls are possible with proper analysis and caution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".