MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Low-severity wildfire prevents catastrophic impacts on fungal communities and soil carbon stability in a fire-affected Douglas-fir ecosystem

2025· article· en· W4406853339 on OpenAlex
Timothy J. Philpott, Gabriel Danyagri, Brian M. Wallace

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoderma · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsGovernment of British Columbia
FundersMinistry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural DevelopmentGovernment of Canada
KeywordsEcosystemDouglas firEnvironmental scienceDisturbance (geology)Soil carbonEcologyForestryAgroforestrySoil waterGeographySoil scienceGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing frequency, extent and severity of wildfire is destabilizing carbon sinks in western North America, underscoring an urgent need to better understand fire impacts on soil carbon stocks, carbon stability, and fungi that regulate soil carbon cycling. Here, we examined the effects of wildfire two years post-burn on soil carbon and fungal communities across a fire severity gradient in Douglas-fir forests in central British Columbia, Canada. We observed no significant differences in soil carbon or fungal community composition between low-severity and unburned stands. In contrast, high-severity wildfire resulted in a 49 % reduction in belowground carbon stocks (20.7 Mg C·ha −1 ), a 91 % decline in ectomycorrhizal fungi, 5- to 27-fold increases in pathogenic fungi, and a proliferation of pyrophilous taxa compared to unburned stands. Carbon was lost primarily as light particulate organic matter, whereas impacts to mineral-associated carbon were muted. Pyrogenic carbon preferentially associated with the mineral fraction, modestly increasing (∼0.15 Mg C·ha −1 ) the proportion of carbon resistant to decay in this stable fraction. Select helotialean (e.g. Phialocephala fortinii ) and other pyrophilous taxa were well-correlated with pyrogenic carbon, suggesting this consortium is well-adapted to decompose persistent carbon and will likely continue to mineralize soil carbon even after high severity wildfire. The markedly higher abundance of pathogenic fungi and reduced ectomycorrhizal abundance in stands affected by high-severity fires pose risks to post-fire recovery, particularly if pathogen proliferation reduces conifer fitness. These results highlight that low-severity wildfires have comparatively muted impacts on soil carbon and fungal communities relative to high-severity wildfires, underscoring the importance of management strategies such as thinning and prescribed burns to mitigate the catastrophic effects of high-severity wildfires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it