MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406856859 · doi:10.57598/r190c

Organisation of care for chronic patients in Belgium

2012· book· en· W4406856859 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dominique Paulus, Koen Van den Heede, Raf Mertens

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SCIENTIFIC REPORT 11 -- 1. THE CHALLENGE OF CHRONIC CARE 11 -- 1.1. CHRONIC CARE: A GROWING BURDEN FOR THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS. 11 -- 1.2. OBJECTIVE: DEVELOPMENT OF A POSITION PAPER FOR CHRONIC CARE IN BELGIUM 11 -- 1.3. SCOPE: FROM “CHRONIC DISEASE” TO “CHRONIC CARE BASED ON THE PATIENT’S NEEDS” 13 -- 1.3.1. Chronic disease: official definitions based on a listing of diseases 13 -- 1.3.2. The patient with “chronic disease”: frequently in the plural 13 -- 1.3.3. Chronic care as an answer to the patient’s needs 13 -- 1.3.4. on care (versus primary prevention and “health in all policies”) 15 -- 1.4. EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COSTS OF CHRONIC DISEASES 15 -- 1.4.1. Epidemiology 15 -- 1.4.2. Costs 16 -- 2. HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE 18 -- 2.1. VIEWPOINTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION 18 -- 2.1.1. Data sources 18 -- 2.1.2. International frameworks: calls for integrated care 18 -- 2.1.3. Shift towards integrated care: advocacy for organizational changes 21 -- 2.1.4. Role of primary care: hub of coordination 22 -- 2.1.5. Summary and conclusions 24 -- 2.2. CHRONIC CARE MODEL 26 -- 2.2.1. Elements of the chronic care model 26 -- 2.2.2. Evidence underlying the chronic care model 27 -- 2.3. HIGHLIGHTS FROM 4 COUNTRIES 28 -- 2.3.1. Methods 28 -- 2.3.2. Stakeholder collaboration: shared vision and leadership 29 -- 2.3.3. Information technologies and performance measurement. 31 -- 2.3.4. Engaging consumers 31 -- 2.3.5. Improving Health Care delivery: translation of the national/regional strategy at local level 32 -- 2.3.6. Aligning finance /insurance: incentives 32 -- 2.3.7. Outcomes 33 -- 2.3.8. Barriers in redesigning chronic care management 33 -- 2.3.9. Key points: lessons learned 33 -- 3. REASONING FRAMEWORK FOR A HEALTH SYSTEM ORIENTED TOWARDS CHRONIC CARE 34 -- 3.1. OBJECTIVE OF THIS CHAPTER 34 -- 3.2. DEVELOPMENT OF A VISION FOR A REFORM OF CHRONIC CARE IN BELGIUM 35 -- 3.2.1. General shape of the vision or root definition 35 -- 3.2.2. Core purpose 36 -- 3.2.3. Additional qualifications 36 -- 3.2.4. Expanded vision/root definition 38 -- 3.3. CONCEPTUAL MODEL: FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITIES REQUIRED FOR A CHRONIC CARE SYSTEM 39 -- 3.3.1. Plan, provide and co-ordinate routine care 40 -- 3.3.2. Provide acute episode response and specialized services 41 -- 3.3.3. Conduct early identification 42 -- 3.3.4. Support patient/informal caregiver empowerment (including self-management) 43 -- 3.3.5. Conduct health promotion and prevention activities 44 -- 3.3.6. Implement and follow-up a dynamic care model 45 -- 3.3.7. Six requirements for each activity 45 -- 3.4. CONCLUDING REMARKS 47 -- 4. CHRONIC CARE INITIATIVES IN BELGIUM 48 -- 4.1. OBJECTIVE OF THIS CHAPTER 48 -- 4.2. METHODS 48 -- 4.2.1. Data sources 48 -- 4.2.2. Data collection 48 -- 4.2.3. Inclusion and exclusion criteria 48 -- 4.3. NATIONAL PLAN: “PRIORITY TO CHRONIC PATIENTS!” 49 -- 4.4. DESCRIPTION OF THE INITIATIVES FROM THE FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT AND FROM THE SICKNESS FUNDS 49 -- 4.4.1. Inventory of initiatives that target patients with a chronic illness 49 -- 4.4.2. Discussion: initiatives from the Federal Public Service Health, Food Chain Safety and environment and from the Sickness Funds 55 -- 4.5. DESCRIPTION OF INITIATIVES FROM THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND DISABILITY INSURANCE 56 -- 4.5.1. Health care system level 56 -- 4.5.2. Plan, provide and coordinate care in the primary care setting 57 -- 4.5.3. Self-empowerment of the patients 63 -- 4.6. KEY POINTS: CHRONIC CARE INITIATIVES IN BELGIUM 64 -- 5. RECOMMENDATIONS IN RELATION TO CHRONIC CARE: ANALYSIS OF KCE REPORTS 65 -- 5.1. OBJECTIVE OF THIS CHAPTER 65 -- 5.2. METHODS 65 -- 5.3. TAILORED DELIVERY SYSTEM DESIGN 65 -- 5.3.1. Strengthening primary care: illustration of type 2 diabetes care 66 -- 5.3.2. Organizational models that streamline transition between primary, secondary and tertiary care 67 -- 5.3.3. Organization of services for the older persons 67 -- 5.3.4. Organization of Palliative care services 69 -- 5.3.5. Organization of Mental Health Care Services 70 -- 5.3.6. Organization of rehabilitation services 70 -- 5.4. APPROPRIATE WORKFORCE 71 -- 5.4.1. Physician workforce planning 71 -- 5.4.2. Attractiveness, recruitment and retention of the GP profession 71 -- 5.4.3. Differentiated Nursing Practice 72 -- 5.4.4. The right function for the right health professional: physiotherapists and pharmacists 72 -- 5.4.5. Important role for the occupational physician and the advisory physician from the sickness funds 73 -- 5.4.6. Role for informal caregivers 73 -- 5.4.7. Curricula and continuous education based on needs 73 -- 5.5. APPROPRIATE FINANCING 74 -- 5.5.1. Financial accessibility 74 -- 5.5.2. Financing system for home care nursing 75 -- 5.5.3. Comparison of two financing systems for primary health care 76 -- 5.5.4. Financial initiatives for quality 76 -- 5.6. QUALITY PROCESSES 77 -- 5.7. DECISION SUPPORT 78 -- 5.7.1. Seamless care with regard to medications 79 -- 5.7.2. Self-empowerment in chronic dialysis 79 -- 5.8. CLINICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS 79 -- 5.9. KEY POINTS: EVIDENCE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM KCE REPORTS 80 -- 6. FOCUS ON PATIENT EMPOWERMENT AND NEW PROFILES/ FUNCTIONS IN THE FIRST LINE OF CARE 82 -- 6.1. OBJECTIVE OF THIS CHAPTER 82 -- 6.2. METHODS 82 -- 6.3. HOW TO FOSTER THE PATIENT SELF-EMPOWERMENT ? INSIGHTS FROM A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 82 -- 6.3.1. Scope of the literature review 83 -- 6.3.2. Methods 84 -- 6.3.3. Results of the search strategy 84 -- 6.3.4. Effectiveness of the interventions: results by disease 88 -- 6.3.5. Summary of the findings: analysis by type of intervention 94 -- 6.3.6. Conclusion: what elements make up successful interventions? 97 -- 6.3.7. Strengths of this review 98 -- 6.3.8. Caveats in the interpretation of results 98 -- 6.3.9. Key points: interventions to foster patient empowerment 99 -- 6.4. NEW PROFILES AND FUNCTIONS IN THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM 99 -- 6.4.1. Objective: analysis of the possible changes within the workforce to tackle the future challenges of chronic care 99 -- 6.4.2. Methods 100 -- 6.4.3. New roles in health care: examples from the UK, Canada and The Netherlands 100 -- 6.4.4. Situation in Belgium 110 -- 6.4.5. Discussion: implementation of new functions and professions in the Belgian health care system 114 -- 6.4.6. Key points: new functions and roles in primary health care 115 -- 7. ORGANIZATION OF CHRONIC CARE IN BELGIUM: STAKEHOLDERS’ ANALYSIS 116 -- 7.1. OBJECTIVE OF THIS CHAPTER 116 -- 7.2. METHODS: CONSULTATION OF STAKEHOLDERS FROM DIFFERENT LEVELS 116 -- 7.2.1. Micro and meso levels: four brainstorming sessions and semi-structured interviews 116 -- 7.2.2. Macro level: two meetings with stakeholders 117 -- 7.3. RESULTS: STAKEHOLDERS’ VIEWS ON THE ORGANIZATION OF CHRONIC CARE IN BELGIUM 118 -- 7.3.1. Theme 1: continuum of care within lines of care and between lines of care calls for coordination 118 -- 7.3.2. Theme 2: Redefining the roles of health professionals and training 121 -- 7.3.3. Theme 3: Empowerment and support of the patient and his/her informal caregiver 124 -- 7.3.4. Theme 4: Payment system influences care 125 -- 7.3.5. Theme 5: Clinical information systems and e-Data 127 -- 7.3.6. Theme 6: Accessibility of care 129 -- 7.3.7. Strengths and limitations of this SWOT analysis 130 -- 7.4. KEY POINTS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE SWOT ANALYSIS WITH STAKEHOLDERS 131 -- 7.4.1. Lack of efficiency 131 -- 7.4.2. Coordination at micro level: a multidisciplinary primary care team is at the centre of a system designed for people with chronic care needs 131 -- 7.4.3. Coordination at the meso level: mid-level scale initiatives to improve seamless care between hospital and home care 131 -- 7.4.4. Task delegation and new functions in the health care system: the added value of medical assistants and qualified nurses 131 -- 7.4.5. Preventing institutionalization: importance of respite care and coaching the informal caregivers 132 -- 7.4.6. Patients and Informal care givers. Roles of their organizations 132 -- 7.4.7. Balancing payment systems 132 -- 7.4.8. Information systems 132 -- 7.4.9. Accessible care 133 -- 8. ANALYSIS OF COORDINATION STRUCTURES AND PROGRAMMES IN BELGIUM 134 -- 8.1. OBJECTIVE OF THIS CHAPTER 134 -- 8.2. BACKGROUND: HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, A COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEM 135 -- 8.3. COORDINATION STRUCTURES AND PROGRAMMES IN HEALTH CARE 135 -- 8.3.1. Coordination structures 135 -- 8.3.2. Coordination programmes 136 -- 8.4. KEY FEATURES OF COORDINATION STRUCTURES AND PROGRAMMES 136 -- 8.4.1. Coordination structures at micro level 136 -- 8.4.2. Need for a geographically integrated system at meso level 138 -- 8.4.3. Towards a uniform vision at macro level 138 -- 8.5. EVOLUTION OF COORDINATION STRUCTURES IN BELGIUM 139 -- 8.5.1. Micro level: from single-handed practices towards more collaboration 139 -- 8.5.2. Meso level: from home care coordinating centres (SIT/CCSSD) to Integrated Primary Care Systems (GDT/SISD) 140 -- 8.6. CARE PROGRAMMES: FIT WITHIN “MICRO” OR “MESO” HORIZONTAL STRUCTURES 142 -- 8.6.1. Local multidisciplinary Networks 143 -- 8.6.2. Alternative forms of care for older persons 143 -- 8.6.3. Palliative care platforms and teams 143 -- 8.7. FROM LESSONS LEARNED TO FUTURE PERSPECTIVES 144 -- REFERENCES 146

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClinical practice guidelines implementationFrench-language works237,207