Single Cell Spatial Transcriptomics Reveals Immunotherapy-Driven Bone Marrow Niche Remodeling in AML
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Given the successful graft-versus-leukemia cell treatment effect observed with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia, immunotherapies have also been investigated in the nontransplant setting. Here, we use a multi-omic approach to investigate spatiotemporal interactions in the bone marrow niche between leukemia cells and immune cells in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia treated with a combination of the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab and hypomethylating agent decitabine. We derived precise segmentation data by extensively training nuclear and membrane cell segmentation models, which enabled accurate transcript assignment and deep learning-feature-based image analysis. To overcome read-depth limitations, we integrated the single-cell RNA sequencing data with single-cell-resolution spatial transcriptomic data from the same sample. Quantifying cell-cell distances between cell edges rather than cell centroids allowed us to conduct a more accurate downstream analysis of the tumor microenvironment, revealing that multiple cell types of interest had global enrichment or local enrichment proximal to leukemia cells after pembrolizumab treatment, which could be associated with their clinical responses. Furthermore, ligand-receptor analysis indicated a potential increase in TWEAK signaling between leukemia cells and immune cells after pembrolizumab treatment. Highlights Spatial transcriptomic analysis of R-AML bone marrow niches provides detailed information about intercellular interactions in the tumor microenvironment. Immunotherapy shifts the cell composition of the leukemia neighborhood. Graphical abstract
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".