Context-specific eQTLs provide deeper insight into causal genes underlying shared genetic architecture of COVID-19 and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most genetic variants identified through genome-wide association studies (GWASs) are suspected to be regulatory in nature, but only a small fraction colocalize with expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs, variants associated with expression of a gene). Therefore, it is hypothesized but largely untested that integration of disease GWAS with context-specific eQTLs will reveal the underlying genes driving disease associations. We used colocalization and transcriptomic analyses to identify shared genetic variants and likely causal genes associated with critically ill COVID-19 and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. We first identified five genome-wide significant variants associated with both diseases. Four of the variants did not demonstrate clear colocalization between GWAS and healthy lung eQTL signals. Instead, two of the four variants colocalized only in cell type- and disease-specific eQTL datasets. These analyses pointed to higher ATP11A expression from the C allele of rs12585036, in monocytes and in lung tissue from primarily smokers, which increased risk of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and decreased risk of critically ill COVID-19. We also found lower DPP9 expression (and higher methylation at a specific CpG) from the G allele of rs12610495, acting in fibroblasts and in IPF lungs, and increased risk of IPF and critically ill COVID-19. We further found differential expression of the identified causal genes in diseased lungs when compared to non-diseased lungs, specifically in epithelial and immune cell types. These findings highlight the power of integrating GWASs, context-specific eQTLs, and transcriptomics of diseased tissue to harness human genetic variation to identify causal genes and where they function during multiple diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".