Amivantamab with or without chemotherapy in right-sided metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated results from OrigAMI-1, an open-label, phase 1b/2 study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
197 Background: Amivantamab (ami) is an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody with immune cell-directing activity and is FDA approved in EGFR -mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. High MET expression is observed in ~68% of patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Additionally, MET amplification occurs in up to 23% of EGFR-resistant mCRC and is implicated in driving resistance to EGFR-targeting antibodies (EGFRi). Compared to left (L)-sided disease, right (R)-sided disease is less responsive to EGFRi and associated with poorer outcomes. We present longer follow-up data among pts with R-sided mCRC. Methods: OrigAMI-1 (NCT05379595) is assessing ami as monotherapy and combined with chemotherapy in mCRC. All pts were wild-type for KRAS , NRAS , BRAF , and EGFR ectodomain by central ctDNA testing, without ERBB2 / HER2 amplification. One ami monotherapy cohort (Cohort C) enrolled only pts with R-sided disease (all pts must have 2-3 prior lines; prior EGFRi allowed). The ami plus chemotherapy cohorts (Cohorts D [with FOLFOX] and E [with FOLFIRI) enrolled both L- and R-sided disease (1 prior line max; prior EGFRi use was exclusionary). Primary tumor locations of cecum, ascending colon, hepatic flexure, and transverse colon were considered R-sided. Response was assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of 26-Aug-2024, 23 pts with R-sided mCRC received ami monotherapy (median follow-up of 8.1 months [mo]). Median number of prior lines was 2, and 43% had prior EGFRi. There were 7 pts with R-sided disease who received ami plus FOLFOX or FOLFIRI (median follow-up of 6.5 mo); all 7 had received 1 prior line. Among pts receiving ami monotherapy, objective response rate (ORR) was 22% (5/23) and disease control rate (DCR) was 78% (18/23), with 1 achieving a complete response. Median duration of response (DoR) is 7.4 mo; response and treatment are ongoing for 3 of the 5 responders. In pts receiving ami plus FOLFOX or FOLFIRI, ORR was 43% (3/7) and DCR was 86% (6/7). Median DoR is 5.8 mo, with all 3 responders on treatment, of which 2 are ongoing response. Additional details are in the Table. Biomarker data will be presented at the meeting. Safety profile among R-sided disease was consistent with prior reports, with the most common ami-related grade 3+ AEs being rash and hypoalbuminemia (2 pts each). Conclusions: Ami monotherapy or combined with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI demonstrated durable antitumor activity in R-sided mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT05379595 . Efficacy. Ami monotherapy (n=23) Ami + FOLFOX or FOLFIRI (n=7) Median follow-up, mo (range) 8.1 (0.6–17.5) 6.5 (3.2–8.8) Median number prior lines 2 1 Prior EGFRi, n (%) 10 (43) 0 ORR, % (95% CI) 22 (8–44) 43 (10–82) Median DoR, mo (95% CI) 7.4 (3.7–NE) 5.8 (NE–NE) a DCR, % (95% CI) 78 (56–93) 86 (42–100) Median progression-free survival, mo (95% CI) 3.7 (3.4–5.5) 7.4 (1.8–NE) a All 3 responders remain on treatment; 2 of 3 responders are ongoing response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".