MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406872884 · doi:10.3390/medicina61020216

Inflammatory Markers as Predictors of Diabetic Nephropathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2025· review· en· W4406872884 on OpenAlex
Daniel‐Corneliu Leucuta, Pauline Aurélia Fumeaux, Oana Almășan, Stefan‐Lucian Popa, Abdulrahman Ismaiel

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicina · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroalbuminuriaMedicineDiabetic nephropathyInternal medicineRed blood cell distribution widthDiabetes mellitusAlbuminuriaOdds ratioHazard ratioNeutrophil to lymphocyte ratioType 2 Diabetes MellitusMeta-analysisGastroenterologyKidney diseaseLymphocyteDiseaseConfidence intervalEndocrinologyKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objectives: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a major complication of diabetes mellitus and a leading cause of end-stage renal disease. Inflammatory markers such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and red cell distribution width (RDW) have been proposed as potential predictors of DN progression. This study systematically reviews and meta-analyzes the role of these markers in DN. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies evaluating NLR, PLR, SII, and RDW in type 2 diabetes patients with normoalbuminuria, microalbuminuria, and macroalbuminuria. Five databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and LILACS. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias in selected articles. Results: Out of 1556 records that were identified through searches, 40 were selected for the review. Finally, 35 were included for meta-analyses, including 13,519 patients. Higher levels of NLR, PLR, SII, and RDW were observed in macro- and microalbuminuria compared to normoalbuminuria, with significantly elevated NLR in microalbuminuria. Meta-analyses showed that NLR and RDW were significantly associated with higher odds of DN (NLR: OR 1.84, p < 0.001; RDW: OR 1.9, p = 0.023). However, PLR and SII were not significantly associated with DN. A longitudinal study confirmed SII as a significant predictor of DN progression (hazard ratio: 3.24, p = 0.023). Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of NLR and RDW as predictive markers for diabetic nephropathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it