Estilos de vida saludable: práctica social de hábitos alimentarios
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Los estilos de vida, considerados patrones de comportamiento influyen en la salud de la población, y los hábitos alimentarios uno de sus componentes. El habitus bajo la forma de disposiciones durables es construido sobre la base de la cultura correspondida con determinado tipo de conocimientos, ideas, valores, habilidades, entre otras. Las condiciones comunes que caracterizan algunas prácticas sociales como los hábitos alimentarios generados por el habitus son en consecuencia los estilos de vida saludables, prioritarios en “La promoción de la salud “contemplada en la Carta de Ottawa. Se sondea puntos de vista de autores como Pierre Bourdieu y Michael Foucault quienes contribuyen significativamente a desplegar sentires de como a través de la experiencia y de las prácticas se forman los modos y estilos de vida en particular de importancia para la salud. En este documento se pretende describir algunas consideraciones que resaltan la importancia de los estilos de vida saludable como procesos sociales que favorecen la Salud Pública, en especial aquellos relacionados con la práctica social de los hábitos alimentarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".