Examining the Biophysical Properties of the Inner Membrane of Gram-Negative ESKAPE Pathogens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The World Health Organization has identified multidrug-resistant bacteria as a serious global health threat. Gram-negative bacteria are particularly prone to antibiotic resistance, and their high rate of antibiotic resistance has been suggested to be related to the complex structure of their cell membrane. The outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria contains lipopolysaccharides that protect the bacteria against threats such as antibiotics, while the inner membrane houses 20–30% of the bacterial cellular proteins. Given the cell membrane’s critical role in bacterial survival, antibiotics targeting the cell membrane have been proposed to combat bacterial infections. However, a deeper understanding of the biophysical properties of the bacterial cell membrane is crucial to developing effective and specific antibiotics. In this study, Martini coarse-grain molecular dynamics simulations were used to investigate the interplay between membrane composition and biophysical properties of the inner membrane across four pathogenic bacterial species: Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, and Escherichia coli . The simulations indicate the impact of species-specific membrane composition on the overall membrane properties. Specifically, the cardiolipin concentration in the inner membrane is a key factor influencing the membrane features. Model membranes with varying concentrations of bacterial lipids (phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, and cardiolipin) further support the significant role of cardiolipin in determining the membrane biophysical properties. The bacterial inner membrane models developed in this work pave the way for future simulations of bacterial membrane proteins and for simulations investigating novel strategies aimed at disrupting the bacterial membrane to treat antibiotic-resistant infections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".