PhysioEx: a new Python library for explainable sleep staging through deep learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. Sleep staging is a crucial task in clinical and research contexts for diagnosing and understanding sleep disorders. This work introduces PhysioEx (Physiological Signal Explainer), a Python library designed to support the analysis of sleep stages using deep learning (DL) and Explainable AI (XAI). Approach. PhysioEx provides an extensible and modular API for standardizing and automating the sleep staging pipeline, covering data preprocessing, model training, testing, fine-tuning, and explainability. It supports both low-resource devices and high-performance computing clusters and includes pretrained models based on the Sleep Heart Health Study dataset. These models support single-channel EEG and multichannel EEG-EOG-EMG configurations and are easily adaptable to custom datasets. PhysioEx also features a command-line interface toolbox allowing users to streamline the model development and deployment. The library offers a range of XAI post-hoc methods to explain model decisions and align them with expert knowledge. Main results. PhysioEx benchmark state-of-the-art sleep staging models in a standard pipeline. Enabling a fair comparison between them both on the training source and out-of-domain sources. Its XAI techniques provide insights into DL-based sleep staging by linking model decisions to human-understandable concepts, such as American Academy of Sleep Medicine-defined rules. Significance. PhysioEx addresses the need for a standardized and accessible platform for sleep staging analysis, combining DL and XAI. By supporting modular workflows and explainable insights, it bridges the gap between machine learning models and clinical expertise. PhysioEx is publicly available and installable via pip6 6 https://pypi.org/project/physioex/ . , making it a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners in sleep medicine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".