MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406909211 · doi:10.26565/2313-6693-2024-51-09

Food insecurity as a target for suicide prevention (literature review)

2024· article· en· W4406909211 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V.Z. Rothschild-Varibrus, M. V. Savina, L.M. Fritzsce

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of V N Karazin Kharkiv National University series Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood insecurityPsychologyEnvironmental healthMedicineFood securityHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. The review presents a summary of English-language sources that explore the relationship between food insecurity and suicidal behavior in humans. The study was conducted to analytically identify a new target for suicide prevention. The hypothesis was tested that food insecurity could be a pro-suicidal factor, i.e., one that increases levels of suicidal activity and mortality, and thus serves as a potential target for suicide prevention. Relevance: The lack of access to adequate and quality nutrition poses a significant psychological, socio-economic, and medical challenge. It contributes to elevated levels of depression, anxiety, and suicidal behavior, particularly among vulnerable population groups such as adolescents, students, older adults, and veterans. Purpose – the study aims to analyze the impact of food insecurity on mental health and suicidal behavior. It identifies the potential of leveraging food security improvement approaches for suicide prevention. Materials and Methods. A systematic review of the literature from the past five years using international databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science). Content analysis of studies and reports to uncover key hypotheses and relationships. A multidisciplinary approach, integrating insights from psychology, sociology, economics, and medicine. Results and discussion. The study confirms that food security plays a vital role in supporting mental health, while its absence is a significant risk factor for developing suicidal behavior. Impact of Food Insecurity on Mental Health: Individuals experiencing food deficits are more prone to anxiety, depression, and suicidal thoughts. For example, in the United States, youth with insufficient food security were three times more likely to develop suicidal ideation compared to their food-secure peers. In Tanzania, schoolchildren suffering from food scarcity had twice the frequency of suicide attempts as their well-fed counterparts. Global Trends: Regions in Africa with chronic food shortages report high levels of suicidal thoughts – up to 30% among adults. In Canada, acute food deprivation was linked to reduced life expectancy and increased suicide risk. Among older adults in low-income countries, inadequate nutrition tripled the likelihood of suicide attempts. Youth and Students as Vulnerable Groups: Food insecurity profoundly impacts the mental health of adolescents and students. In Canada, up to 13% of adolescents facing food insecurity reported suicidal thoughts. Similarly, in Bangladesh, 75.5% of university students experienced food insecurity, which was associated with high rates of suicidal ideation, plans, and attempts. Challenges Faced by Military Veterans: Among U.S. military veterans, food insecurity was associated with nearly a fourfold increase in the risk of suicidal thoughts. This risk was particularly pronounced among those with co-existing mental health disorders. Social Mechanisms of Influence: Food insufficiency leads to stress, feelings of social isolation, and hopelessness – factors that significantly increase the likelihood of suicidal thoughts. It was found that up to 46% of this link is mediated by stress and isolation. Heterogeneity in Data and Methodology: Some aspects of the research remain unevenly addressed. Differences in measuring food insecurity complicate the comparison of results; however, all sources confirm its substantial impact on mental well-being. Results. The results highlight the need for a comprehensive approach to addressing food security issues. Recognizing the absence of food security as a major risk factor for mental health opens new avenues for developing targeted suicide prevention programs. Ensuring access to quality food, conducting localized research, and integrating food security parameters into national policy plans can significantly reduce suicide risks. Notably, the creation of regional support programs targeting vulnerable groups can ensure both physical and psychological well-being. Conclusion: The findings confirm that food security is not merely a socio-economic issue but also a crucial psychological category that demands attention from both the scientific community and governments. Ensuring food security transcends the fulfillment of physical needs, encompassing complex socio-economic and psychological challenges. Its provision is a vital step toward preserving mental health and saving lives globally. Recognizing food insecurity as a target for suicide prevention offers new opportunities to alleviate social tension and safeguard human lives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0090.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of V N Karazin Kharkiv National University series MedicineSame topicFood Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsFrench-language works237,207