MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406911983 · doi:10.52609/jmlph.v5i2.167

Effects of Bans on Prostitution on Prevalence of Induced Abortions

2025· article· en· W4406911983 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hiroyuki Kobayashi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Medicine Law & Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduced AbortionsAbortionCriminologyMedicineObstetricsPsychologyEnvironmental healthBiologyPregnancyGeneticsFamily planningPopulationResearch methodology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Prostitutes are at high risk of unintended pregnancy, and induced abortions are widely practised among this cohort.Aims: This study examined the effects of prostitution bans on the prevalence of induced abortions. We focused particularly on the bans on juvenile prostitution, which were introduced by 32 states of Japan between 1975 and 1998.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study employing event-study analyses and a difference-in-difference-in-differences methodology. We compared the changes in numbers of induced abortions before and after the bans were introduced, among women under 20 years of age and among those aged 20―24 years, over states.Results: The number of induced abortions among women under 20 years of age increased after the juvenile prostitution bans were implemented. In the fifth year of implementation, the number increased by 56.79 percentage points (p < 0.001) compared with the previous year.Conclusion: The number of induced abortions among adolescents increased after juvenile prostitution was banned. As to its mechanism, the outcomes of our additional identification suggest that former juvenile prostitutes who retired due to the bans contributed to the increase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Medicine Law & Public HealthSame topicSex work and related issuesFrench-language works237,207