Tectonometamorphic history across the Chesterfield Fault Zone: Implications for tectonic evolution of the Rae Craton, Nunavut, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• The CFZ represents a Paleoproterozoic tectonometamorphic break within the Rae craton. • The Rae craton was variably reworked during discrete accretionary collisional events. • Rb-Sr mica dates are more reliable than 40 Ar- 39 Ar dates if excess Ar is suspected. • Isotope dilution and in situ Lu-Hf garnet geochronology are complementary methods. • Strike-slip partitioning among shear zones is an effective exhumation mechanism. Extensive debate has focussed on the nature and location of the Snowbird Tectonic Zone (STZ), the suture between the Rae and Hearne cratons. Geological mapping in the Baker Lake area revealed a ∼7 km wide deformation zone associated with the Chesterfield Fault Zone (CFZ), a south-dipping, dextral strike-slip structure previously interpreted to represent the northern segment of the STZ. New geochronology across the CFZ indicates both the footwall and hangingwall are dominated by ca. 2.72 Ga tonalite gneisses and ca. 2.6 Ga porphyritic monzogranite, effectively ruling out the CFZ as the northern segment of the STZ. Geochronology, thermobarometry, and thermodynamic modelling from the hangingwall indicate three Paleoproterozoic metamorphic events (M1-M3) that outline a clockwise P-T-t path. Prograde metamorphism (M1) reaching peak conditions of 0.75 GPa and 700 °C is dated by early titanite growth at ca. 1.92 Ga, consistent with burial during southeast-verging folding and thrusting associated with collision of the Rae-Chesterfield and Hearne cratons. Peak conditions of ∼1.0 GPa and 740 °C at ca. 1.87 Ga (M2; garnet Lu-Hf) are coeval with northwest-vergent folding and thrusting during early, intra-oceanic accretionary episodes associated with the Trans-Hudson Orogeny. Dextral strike-slip kinematics argue against the CFZ as the structure responsible for exhumation of ca. 1.9 Ga high-pressure rocks to the south. Instead, exhumation may have been accommodated along discrete, reverse-sense shear zones associated with the CFZ, or an alternate structure to the south. Together, these data highlight that crustal-scale shear zones can preserve tectonometamorphic information, critical for tectonic reconstructions and understanding orogenic processes, that is not recorded in the surrounding lithotectonic blocks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".