MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406917986 · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.4c05215

Room-Temperature Selective Detection of H<sub>2</sub> by Pd Nanoparticle-Decorated SnO<sub>2</sub>@WO<sub>3</sub> Core–Shell Hollow Structures

2025· article· en· W4406917986 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Bai, Xiaoli Ran, Xiaohong Yang, Shixian Xiong, Feng Gu, Shufen Wang, Jiangcheng Li, Haitao Fu, Xizhong An

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersKey Research and Development Program of Liaoning ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChemistryNanoparticleShell (structure)NanotechnologyCore (optical fiber)Chemical engineeringOpticsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sensitive H 2 sensors play key roles in the large-scale and safe applications of H 2 . In this study, we developed novel ternary Pd-loaded SnO 2 @WO 3 core–shell structures by hydrothermal and in situ reduction methods. The compositions of the optimized ternary core–shell structures (Pd-SW-2) are prepared on the basis of the optimal binary core–shell structures (SW-X) according to the sensing performances to H 2 . Gas sensing tests reveal that the sensing performances (e.g., sensing response and response/recovery time) to H 2 are gradually improved after the formation of core–shell structures and the modification of Pd nanoparticles. 10Pd-SW-2 exhibits the highest response (370 times and 204 times higher than those of SnO 2 and SW-2, respectively) and the shortest response and recovery time (19/53 s) to 100 ppm of H 2 at 25 °C among the as-prepared ternary and binary composites. Combined with the morphology, XPS, electrochemical, H 2 -TPR, and O 2 -TPD analyses, the underlying reasons for the improved sensing performance of 10Pd-SW-2 are attributed to (1) the unique core–shell hollow structure and appropriate Pd particle sizes and distribution, (2) abundant oxygen vacancies, (3) the electron sensitization resulting from the energy band structure, and (4) the excellent chemical sensitization originated from the interaction between Pd/PdHx/PdO and H 2 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicGas Sensing Nanomaterials and SensorsFrench-language works237,207