MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406918216 · doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.4c01201

Fast Free-Form Phase Mask Design for Three-Dimensional Photolithography Using Convergent Born Series

2025· article· en· W4406918216 on OpenAlexaff
Dohyeon Lee, Moosung Lee, Bakytgul Yerenzhep, Myungjoon Kim, Hervé Hugonnet, Seokwoo Jeon, Jonghwa Shin, YongKeun Park

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Photonics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Photolithography Techniques
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
FundersInstitute for Information and Communications Technology PromotionNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsSeries (stratigraphy)PhotolithographyPhase (matter)OpticsPhysicsMaterials scienceComputer scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advancements in three-dimensional (3D) photolithography are crucial for enhancing the performance of devices in applications ranging from energy storage and sensors to microrobotics. Proximity-field nanopatterning (PnP), which utilizes light-shaping phase masks, has emerged as a promising method to boost productivity. This study presents a swift and effective strategy for the design of phase masks tailored to the PnP process. Conventional design methodologies, grounded in basic optical theories, have been constrained by the simplicity and limited contrast of the resulting nanopatterns. Our approach, which merges the use of a frequency-domain electromagnetic solver─termed the convergent Born series─with gradient-based optimization and GPU acceleration, successfully addresses these shortcomings. The proposed solver outperforms CPU-intensive commercial FDTD software in our 2D test case by approximately 30 times, and its computational advantage increases in 3D simulations. This approach facilitates the creation of complex, high-contrast nanostructures within practical timeframes. We validate our method’s effectiveness by engineering phase masks to produce distinct hologram patterns, such as single and double helices, thereby underscoring its utility for pioneering nanophotonic devices. Our findings propel the PnP process forward, ushering in novel avenues for the creation of sophisticated 3D nanostructures with superior optical and mechanical features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS PhotonicsSame topicAdvancements in Photolithography TechniquesFrench-language works237,207