MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406920512 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00549.2024

Sexual dimorphism in right ventricular adaptation to pressure overload involves differential angiogenic response

2025· article· en· W4406920512 on OpenAlexafffund
Erica R. Seelemann, Sheethal Panchakshari, Parabhjot Kaur Labana, Maxwell M. Wolverton, Yupu Deng, Heba Wagih Abdelwahab, Chris Consmueller, Duncan J. Stewart, Ketul R. Chaudhary

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of OttawaDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDalhousie UniversityCanada Foundation for InnovationDalhousie Medical Research Foundation
KeywordsInternal medicineVentricleEndocrinologyPressure overloadAngiogenesisSexual dimorphismBiologyVentricular remodelingMuscle hypertrophyHemodynamicsMedicineHeart failureCardiac hypertrophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Female patients with pulmonary hypertension have better right ventricular adaptation compared with male. These sex differences were modeled in right heart failure susceptible Fischer CDF rat using pulmonary artery banding model. Preservation of right ventricular function in female rats is linked to better right ventricular angiogenic response that involves higher intrinsic angiogenic ability of female right ventricular endothelial cells together with the proangiogenic effects of female sex hormone estradiol through sphingosine kinase-1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology→Same topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→