Thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion does not restore cerebral blood flow or electrical activity despite collateral supra-aortic blood flow in a porcine model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: It is unknown whether ligation of supra-aortic vessels during thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) can prevent postmortem brain function, ensuring the permanence of death. Our objective was to determine if ligation of the supra-aortic vessels during TA-NRP prevents resumption of intracranial blood flow, brain electrical activity and clinical brain function in a porcine model of organ donation after circulatory arrest. Methods: Neuromonitoring was performed in 9 porcine experiments, in which supra-aortic vessels were ligated. Results: During TA-NRP and organ procurement, no motor reaction to pain, spontaneous ventilation, eye movement or change in pupillary function were observed. Angiography demonstrated absence of supra-aortic blood flow in 4 (44%) experiments and delayed, discrete and transient supra-aortic extracranial opacification in 5 (56%) experiments. No intracranial blood flow was observed. All electroencephalograms demonstrated absent brain electrical activity. Conclusion: In this porcine model, occlusion of the supra-aortic vessels during TA-NRP did not restore post-mortem cerebral blood flow or electrical activity and is in adequation with the permanence of death.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".