MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406927093 · doi:10.53103/cjess.v5i1.288

Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of and Preparation for the Math Proficiency Test

2025· article· en· W4406927093 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Assessment and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationTest (biology)Test preparationPerceptionPsychologyTeacher preparationMathematicsTeacher educationEngineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pre-service teachers in Ontario, Canada are required to pass the Math Proficiency Test (MPT) to obtain teacher certification. The MPT has two separate sections that focus on content and general pedagogy. An online survey about the Math Proficiency Test was developed and distributed to pre-service teachers to investigate their perceptions of and preparation for the MPT. Results are reported in relation to four main survey factors: 1) support for the MPT, 2) math anxiety, 3) math teaching confidence, and 4) preparedness for the MPT. In general, pre-service teachers were not in favour of the Math Proficiency Test and reported high levels of anxiety about taking it, despite their low levels of math performance anxiety and high levels of math teaching confidence. Study implications are discussed in relation to the merits of pre-service teacher testing in mathematics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Educational and Social StudiesSame topicEducational Assessment and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207