The correlation between blastocyst morphological parameters and chromosomal euploidy, aneuploidy and other chromosomal abnormalities following pre-implantation genetic testing—a single center retrospective study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the association between blastocyst morphology and chromosomal status utilizing pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study including 169 in-vitro fertilization cycles that underwent PGT-A using Next Generation Sequencing (2017-2022). Blastocysts were morphologically scored based on Gardner and Schoolcraft's criteria. Chromosomal analysis results included: euploid; aneuploid (single or double); segmental; mosaic; and complex (≥ 3 chromosome abnormalities). We examined associations between morphological parameters and chromosomal statuses of biopsied embryos utilizing multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 855 blastocysts underwent PGT-A (PGT-A alone: N = 804; unaffected PGT for monogenic disease (PGT-M) embryos along with PGT-A: N = 51). Of these, 826 were successfully analyzed, with 321 euploid embryos (38.86%). Various morphological parameters (embryo quality, inner cell mass (ICM), trophectoderm (TE), and expansion stage) were more frequent within the double (n = 72, 8.72%), complex (n = 97, 11.74%), mosaic (n = 139, 16.83%), and segmental aneuploidy (n = 28, 3.39%) groups, with similar associations between different morphological parameters and single aneuploidy (n = 169, 20.46%). Utilizing multivariate logistic regression, higher expansion, embryo quality, and TE and ICM grades, were associated with increased odds of euploidy (versus non-euploidy). Higher expansion was a positive predictor of single versus double aneuploidy (aOR 2.94, 95% CI 1.52-5.56, p = 0.001); and higher ICM grade was a positive predictor of single versus complex aneuploidy (aOR 2.86, 95% CI 1.15-7.12, p = 0.024). No morphological parameter was found to be associated with single versus mosaic aneuploidy. CONCLUSION: Various morphological parameters are associated with euploidy and different aneuploidy statuses of pre-implantation blastocysts. These findings may aid in the selection of the assumed best chromosomally structured blastocyst for transfer when PGT-A is not performed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".