The relative and respective effects of social support on life-domain interactions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based upon the conservation of resource theory, this study investigates the respective and relative effects of various social support sources on employees' perceptions regarding the conflicts and enrichments they experienced between their work-life (WL) and personal life (PL) in both directions (WL → PL and PL → WL). Our survey has 798 employee respondents. Concerning their life-domain conflicts, results show that variance in their WL → PL conflicts is accounted for by sources of support in the workplace, in the following order: organisation, supervisor, and co-workers. Variance in their PL → WL conflicts is explained, in order, by the support received from family and friends and the organisation. Concerning their life-domain enrichments, results show that the support received from their supervisor accounts for the variance in WL → PL and PL → WL enrichments. In contrast, the one obtained from family and friends only explains the variance in PL → WL enrichment. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of these results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it