MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406932325 · doi:10.29169/1927-5129.2025.21.04

Evaluation of Some Secondary Radio Meteorological Variables for Line-of-Sight Applications over Some Locations in Nigeria

2025· article· en· W4406932325 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Adekunle Titus Adediji, M. O. Ajewole, P.N. Okunwa, A. C. Tomiwa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Basic & Applied Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Wave Propagation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLine-of-sightSightLine (geometry)Computer scienceMeteorologyRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceGeographyTelecommunicationsEngineeringMathematicsAerospace engineeringAstronomyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reliable data on radio propagation is required to suggest useful models for radio-climatic study. Computation of some secondary radio parameters across ten locations in Nigeria was done to deduce their effects on Line-of-Sight links. ERA-5 data obtained from the archive of European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) comprising of surface air and dew temperature, atmospheric pressure and relative humidity covering eight years (January 2010 – December 2017) was utilized. The results show that average radio refractivity values during the wet season (343.4 N-units) was higher than the dry season (273 N-units) and radio refractivity gradient values increase as the wet season progresses. Mean effective earth radius factor (k-factor) for the period of study were 1.38, 1.34, 1.67 and 1.72 for the rainforest, mangrove swamp, Sudan and guinea savannah regions respectively. It was also observed that a distinct relationship exists between the geo-climatic factor (K) and the seasons of the year with a range of 2.2 ×10-5 to 1.0 ×10-4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Basic & Applied SciencesSame topicRadio Wave Propagation StudiesFrench-language works237,207