MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Acoustics, balance, and chimpanzees – The ABCs of developing a deep learning-based automated acoustic detector for wild chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) loud calls

2025· preprint· en· W4406934606 on OpenAlexaff
Adrienne Chitayat, Jan Clemens, Catherine Crockford, Anne‐Sophie Crunchant, Ammie K. Kalan, A. Piel, Fiona A. Stewart, Serge A. Wich

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTroglodytesDetectorBalance (ability)AcousticsArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePsychologySpeech recognitionPhysicsBiologyTelecommunicationsZoologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is a powerful tool for wildlife monitoring, but the time and expertise required to process large volumes of data pose significant challenges. Automated acoustic detectors improve efficiency by speeding up data processing. Class imbalance, resulting from fewer target signals relative to noise, complicates development and can negatively impact performance. However, training datasets should also reflect the conditions of real-world PAM datasets. 2. We developed an automated acoustic detector for chimpanzee loud calls while addressing class imbalance. We predicted that greater data diversity and high-quality data (clear signals, minimal noise interference) would enhance network performance and that class imbalance, by supporting diversity, is essential for functionality. We built training datasets with data recorded in wild settings and applied a temporal convolutional neural network approach using Deep Audio Segmenter (DAS). We trained networks using datasets containing varying levels of noise (50%, 75%, 90%, 99%) and also tested the effectiveness of frequency removal in improving performance. 3. The network performances varied significantly, with F1 scores of 0.44 to 0.86, exceeding a previous study (5% F1). The most imbalanced dataset produced the best performing network, capturing 90% of pant-hoot events and annotating them with 90% (SD = 20.9) accuracy. The results showed that increased class size was associated with greater intraclass diversity and improved precision (0.41–0.83). The networks showed consistently high recall rates, especially when frequency removal was not applied (0.89–0.92). 4. This study stresses the importance of class size and diversity in developing automated acoustic detectors. It also highlights the value of high-quality data for accurate pattern recognition of the target signal and the importance of the noise class for effective class decoupling and detector functionality. This research supports the advancement of PAM in chimpanzee studies, opening new opportunities to integrate remote sensing for efficient wildlife monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMusic and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207