Different Imaging Evaluating Performances Between Glymphatic System and Motor Symptoms and Levodopa Responsiveness of Parkinson Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Parkinson disease (PD) is defined by its unique motor symptoms, where responsiveness to levodopa (L-DOPA) is fundamental for management. Recent research has highlighted a significant relationship between PD symptoms and glymphatic dysfunction. This study endeavors to clarify the connection between glymphatic system functionality and initial motor symptoms in PD, utilizing imaging biomarkers to determine its predictive capacity for L-DOPA responsiveness (LR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 86 PD patients with 3.0-T MRI scans (July 2019 to March 2021), assessing the diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) methods, enlarged perivascular spaces (ePVSs) load, and choroid plexus volume (CPV). Analyzed metrics versus the third part of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRSIII) scores and %LR using linear regression, creating a %LR prediction model for the L-DOPA challenge. Explored relationships with age, sex, Hoehn and Yahr stage, Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores, and Mini-Mental State Examination score. Examined DTI-ALPS index, ePVSs, and CPV interrelations. RESULTS: Pre-L-DOPA, UPDRSIII inversely correlated with DTI-ALPS index ( P =0.049), positively with bilateral basal ganglia ePVSs ( P <0.001). Age-adjusted BG-ePVSs-UPDRSIII link ( P <0.001). Post-L-DOPA, UPDRSIII correlated similarly and CPV was positive. %LR positively linked to DTI-ALPS index ( P <0.001), negatively to BG-ePVSs ( P =0.04), CPV ( P <0.001). Adjusted %LR-DTI-ALPS index positive ( P =0.005), %LR-CPV negative ( P =0.04). DTI-ALPS index, CPV predicted LCT outcomes (%LR ≥33%) with area under the curves 0.78, 0.79; accuracies 86.01%, 81.4%. The combined model area under the curve is 0.82, with an accuracy of 87.2%. Significant linear correlations were observed (CPV-DTI-ALPS, CPV-ePVSs, DTI-ALPS-ePVSs). CONCLUSIONS: A study affirms the link between glymphatic impairment, motor symptoms, and L-DOPA responses in PD. As glymphatic function declines, symptoms worsen, and L-DOPA effectiveness diminishes. The DTI-ALPS index and CPV emerge as potential predictors of PD patient LCT outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".