Comparison of the effectiveness of intra-infrapatellar fat pad and intra-articular glucocorticoid injection in knee osteoarthritis patients with Hoffa’s synovitis: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The infrapatellar fat pad and synovium are the sites of immune cell infiltration and the origin of proinflammation. Studies have shown that Hoffa's synovitis may be a sign of early-stage osteoarthritis (OA). However, there have been no effective interventions specifically for Hoffa's synovitis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a multicentre, multi-blind (participant, physician, outcome assessor and data analyst blinded) randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of an intra-infrapatellar fat glucocorticoid versus an intra-articular injection for Hoffa's synovitis in patients with knee OA. We will recruit 236 knee OA patients with Hoffa's synovitis at outpatient clinics in three centres. We will randomly allocate them to two groups in a 1:1 ratio. One group will receive ultrasound-guided injection of 40 mg (1 mL) triamcinolone acetonide into the infrapatellar fat pad; the other group will receive ultrasound-guided injection of 40 mg (1 mL) triamcinolone acetonide into the knee joint cavity. All patients will be followed up at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks after the injection. Primary outcomes are (1) Hoffa's synovitis improvement rate, measured with the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score system (superiority outcome) at 24 weeks and (2) pain intensity, measured with the Western Ontario and McMasters University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at 2 weeks post-injection. Secondary outcomes include Hoffa's synovitis score at 2 weeks post-injection, pain intensity with the numerical rating scale, WOMAC questionnaire score improvements (function, joint stiffness and total score), improvement rates in effusion synovitis at 2 and 24 weeks, articular cartilage thickness changes at 2 and 24 weeks, Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain score, quality of life measured with the EuroQol-5D, OARSI-OMERACT response indicators, co-interventions and side effects at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (2023-178). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients prior to data collection. The findings of this research will be shared through presentations at academic conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2400080474.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.035 | 0.038 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.016 | 0.008 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".