MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406938434 · doi:10.1101/2025.01.28.635154

Customizing the Structure of Minimal TIM Barrels to Craft Efficient <i>De Novo</i> Enzymes

2025· preprint· en· W4406938434 on OpenAlexaff
Julian Beck, B. J. Smith, Niayesh Zarifi, Emily Freund, Roberto A. Chica

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBarrel (horology)Active siteEnzymeChemistryCatalysisSubstrate (aquarium)Protein engineeringStereochemistryNanotechnologyBiochemistryComputational biologyBiologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The TIM barrel is the most prevalent fold in natural enzymes, supporting efficient catalysis of diverse chemical reactions. While de novo TIM barrels have been successfully designed, their minimalistic architecture lacks structural elements essential for substrate binding and catalysis. Here, we present CANVAS, a computational workflow that introduces a structural lid into a minimal de novo TIM barrel to anchor catalytic residues and form an active-site pocket for enzymatic function. Starting from two de novo TIM barrels, we designed nine variants with distinct lids to form active sites for the Kemp elimination. Four designs showed measurable activity, with the most active reaching a catalytic efficiency of 21,000 M⁻¹ s⁻¹ at its optimal pH. A co-crystal structure of this variant bound to a transition-state analogue confirmed the accuracy of the designed lid and active site. Using the X-ray structure of a lower-activity variant (19 M⁻¹ s⁻¹), we applied ensemble-based design to optimize its active site, increasing catalytic efficiency by &gt;1,600-fold to 32,000 M⁻¹ s⁻¹. These results demonstrate that de novo TIM barrels can be endowed with substrate binding pockets supporting efficient catalytic function, establishing a platform for building enzymes on demand from minimal protein scaffolds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPeptidase Inhibition and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207