Emergence and spread of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (BA.1) variant across Africa: an observational study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In mid-November, 2021, the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant (B.1.1.529; BA.1 sublineage) was detected in southern Africa, prompting international travel restrictions. We aimed to investigate the spread of omicron BA.1 in Africa. METHODS: ) at the country level considering the BA.1 fraction and the reported numbers of infections. Phylogeographical analyses were done in a Bayesian framework. FINDINGS: of 2·60 (95% CI 2·46-2·71). This south-north spread, established on the basis of PCR data, was substantiated by phylogeographical reconstructions, ancestral state reconstructions, and GISAID data. PCR-based reconstructions of country-level BA.1 predominance and the availability of BA.1 genomic sequences in GISAID correlated significantly in time (p=0·0002, r=0·78). The first detections of BA.1 in high-income settings beyond Africa were predicted accurately in time by mobility-based mathematical simulations (p<0·0001). Comparing PCR-based reconstructions with mobility-based mathematical simulations suggested that SARS-CoV-2 infections in Africa were under-reported by approximately ten times. Inbound travellers infected with BA.1, departing from five continents, were identified in six African countries by early December, 2021. INTERPRETATION: and the geographical spread of emerging pathogens in a cost-effective and timely manner, and can guide evidence-based, non-pharmaceutical interventions such as travel restrictions or physical distancing. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. TRANSLATIONS: For the French, Portugese and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".