MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406939539 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(24)00472-8

Causes of HIV-related CNS infection in Cameroon, Malawi, and Tanzania: epidemiological findings from the DREAMM HIV-related CNS implementation study

2025· article· en· W4406939539 on OpenAlexaff
Cecilia Kanyama, Charles Kouanfack, Sayoki Mfinanga, Sokoine Kivuyo, Emma Beaumont, Aude Sturny-Leclère, Sam Phiri, Jonathon Ngoma, Meshack Shimwela, Daniel Nkungu, Lauriane Nomene Fomete, Rehema H. Simbauranga, Chimwemwe Chawinga, Nicaine Ngakam, Tom Heller, Sandrine Sa’a Lontsi, Rebecca Gathercole, Elnara Aghakishiyeva, Radha Rajasingham, Mina C. Hosseinipour, John Bradley, Shabbar Jaffar, Olivier Lortholary, Thomas S. Harrison, Síle F. Molloy, Timothée Boyer‐Chammard, Angela Loyse

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Global Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicToxoplasma gondii Research Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersEuropean and Developing Countries Clinical Trials PartnershipAgence Nationale de Recherches sur le Sida et les Hépatites Virales
KeywordsTanzaniaEpidemiologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)MedicineEnvironmental healthVirologyGeographyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background CNS infections cause approximately a third of HIV-related deaths. The Driving Reduced AIDS-Associated Meningo-encephalitis Mortality DREAMM study aimed to prospectively diagnose the aetiology of HIV-related CNS infection in five public hospitals in Cameroon, Malawi, and Tanzania. Methods DREAMM was a multicentre, hybrid type-2 implementation science project. Adults (aged ≥18 years) presenting with a first episode of suspected CNS infection, who were HIV seropositive or willing to have an HIV test, were eligible for recruitment. Following implementation of the DREAMM model of care, we measured the prevalence of cryptococcal meningitis, tuberculous meningitis, bacterial meningitis, and cerebral toxoplasmosis and did a χ 2 test to assess whether prevalence differed between countries. We also reported disease-specific mortality and Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence. Findings Of 356 participants with suspected CNS infection analysed at baseline, 269 (76%) were diagnosed as having a CNS infection. Of these, 202 (75%) had a confirmed diagnosis. Between Cameroon, Malawi, and Tanzania, the prevalence of the four main types of CNS infection differed (cryptococcal meningitis p=0·0014, bacterial meningitis p=0·0043, CNS tuberculosis p<0·0001, and toxoplasmosis p<0·0001). Cryptococcal meningitis (148 [55%] of 269) was the leading cause overall. The next most common causes were CNS tuberculosis in Tanzania (29 [29%] of 99) and bacterial meningitis in Malawi (15 [19%] of 80). In Cameroon, cerebral toxoplasmosis (39 [43%] of 90) was the leading cause followed by cryptococcal meningitis (36 [40%] of 90). For cryptococcal meningitis, all-cause 2-week mortality was 23% (34 of 147) and all-cause 10-week mortality was 45% (66 of 146). Interpretation Within the study population, the aetiology of HIV-related CNS infection varied substantially between Malawi, Cameroon, and Tanzania. Additional prospective epidemiological data are needed to inform HIV programmes. 2-week cryptococcal meningitis mortality outcomes were similar to those of clinical trials. However, new interventions are urgently needed to sustain mortality reductions following hospital discharge. Funding European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership and French Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis. Translations For the French and Portuguese translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Global HealthSame topicToxoplasma gondii Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207