MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406939540 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(24)00451-0

Social and health disparities associated with healthy brain ageing in Brazil and in other Latin American countries

2025· article· en· W4406939540 on OpenAlexaff
Lucas Uglione Da Ros, Wyllians Vendramini Borelli, Cristiano Schaffer Aguzzoli, Marco Antônio De Bastiani, Lucas Porcello Schilling, Hernando Santamaría‐García, Tharick A. Pascoal, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Diogo O. Souza, Jaderson Costa da Costa, Agustín Ibáñez, Cláudia Kimie Suemoto, Eduardo R. Zimmer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Global Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersFondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas PrioritariasNational Institutes of HealthAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloInstituto SerrapilheiraMinistério da Ciência e TecnologiaInstituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia para Excitotoxicidade e NeuroproteçãoFogarty International CenterNational Academy of NeuropsychologyFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do SulConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoAlzheimer's SocietyGlobal Brain Health InstituteBiogenMinistério da SaúdeEli Lilly and CompanyNovo NordiskEisaiNational Institute on AgingAlzheimer's Association
KeywordsLatin AmericansSocial determinants of healthPolitical scienceGerontologyMEDLINEAgeingHealth equityDevelopment economicsEconomic growthMedicineEnvironmental healthPublic healthEconomicsNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Latin American countries present major health-related inequities due to historical, cultural, and social aspects. Recent evidence highlights that factors related to social and health disparities outweigh classic demographic factors in determining healthy brain aging in these populations. However, these analyses have not been conducted with the Brazilian population, the largest and most ethnically diverse population in Latin America. METHODS: Here, we evaluated demographic, social, and health factors for healthy brain ageing using a machine learning model in a Brazilian population-based cohort (n=9412) and in additional cohorts from other Latin American countries, including Colombia (n=23 694), Chile (n=1301), Ecuador (n=5235), and Uruguay (n=1450). FINDINGS: In the Brazilian population and other Latin American countries, social and health disparities were more influential than demographic factors for cognition and functional ability. Uniquely in Brazil, education emerged as the primary risk factor impacting cognitive outcomes, diverging from other Latin American countries where mental health symptoms played more prominent roles. In terms of functional ability, Brazil displayed a distinct pattern, with mental health symptoms identified as the primary contributing factor. INTERPRETATION: Our findings indicate that Brazil converges with other Latin American countries to show that heterogeneous factors impacted more than demographic factors, but also showed a unique set of health factors when compared with other Latin American countries. Therefore, our study emphasises that social and health disparity factors are relevant predictors of healthy brain ageing in Latin America, but population-specific analyses are necessary to identify the specific risk profiles of each country. FUNDING: None. TRANSLATIONS: For the Portuguese and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Global HealthSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207