MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406944849 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofae631.774

P-576. Real-world Experience with the Two-Drug Regimen Dolutegravir/Lamivudine for the Treatment of HIV-1 among Vulnerable People Living with HIV in Canada: Preliminary Results from a Chart Review Study

2025· review· en· W4406944849 on OpenAlexaffabout
Emmanuelle Huchet, Joann K. Ban, Adenike Adelakun, Katherine M. Osenenko, Isabelle Hardy, Elaine Stewart, Michael McKimm, Jean-François Fortin, Madeleine Crabtree, Karissa Johnston, Brian Conway, V. Paul DiMondi

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Canadian institutionsVancouver Infectious Diseases CentreGlaxoSmithKline (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDolutegravirMedicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)LamivudineRegimenVirologyRilpivirineFamily medicinePediatricsAntiretroviral therapyInternal medicineViral loadVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Compared to the general population of people living with HIV, vulnerable people, such as those who use drugs, are disproportionately affected by HIV, and are predisposed to lower adherence to antiretroviral therapies (ARTs), which may result in poorer virologic suppression, worse health outcomes, and higher HIV transmission rates. Some may benefit from simpler single-tablet regimens that are effective, well tolerated, and limit exposure to unnecessary medications. We evaluated clinical outcomes in vulnerable people living with HIV who switched to the single-tablet, 2-drug regimen dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC). Methods This ongoing chart review study included people living with HIV (≥ 18 years) in Canada who switched to DTG/3TC between 09/09/2019 and 31/05/2023, and had ≥ 1 of the following vulnerability criteria: recent drug use, opioid agonist use, recent or well-documented history of unstable housing or receiving social assistance, Indigenous identity, or ≥ 65 years of age with diminished autonomy (‘vulnerable senior’). Descriptive summary statistics were generated for demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline (≤ 12 months pre-switch), and viral load and CD4+ cell counts at 6 (± 2) and 12 (± 2) months post-switch. Interim results are reported for the ongoing study. Results Across 5 sites, 20 eligible people were included (mean age: 49.9 ± 13.0 years; male: 80%; drug use: 80%; vulnerable senior: 20%). Simplification of ART was the predominant reason for switch to DTG/3TC (n=11, 55%). At the time of analysis, 80% (n=16) had at least 6 months of follow-up, and one discontinued DTG/3TC due to intolerance. At 6 months, of those with test results, 8/8 were virally suppressed (< 50 c/mL), and median (IQR) CD4+ cell count was 815 (122.5) cells/mm3. At 12 months, 11/12 were virally suppressed (< 50 c/mL), and median CD4+ cell count was 920 (180) cells/mm3 (n=10). Conclusion Preliminary results suggest promising effectiveness outcomes among vulnerable people living with HIV who switch to DTG/3TC. These results support the continued expansion of this study to include more people. Disclosures Emmanuelle Huchet, MD, AbbVie: Honoraria|Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences: Honoraria|Indivior: Advisor/Consultant|ViiV Healthcare: Advisor/Consultant Joann K. Ban, PharmD, MSc, GSK: employee Adenike R. Adelakun, BPharm, MSc, GSK: employee Katherine Osenenko, MCPM, Broadstreet HEOR: employee|ViiV Healthcare: Funding for the conduct of this work Isabelle Hardy, PhD, ViiV Healthcare: employee Elaine Stewart, HBSc, ViiV Healthcare: employee Michael McKimm, BSc, ViiV Healthcare: employee Jean-Francois Fortin, MD, ViiV Healthcare: employee Madeleine Crabtree, MPH, Broadstreet HEOR: employee|ViiV Healthcare: Funding for the conduct of this work Karissa Johnston, MSc, PhD, Broadstreet HEOR: employee|ViiV Healthcare: Funding for the conduct of this work Brian Conway, MD, AbbVie: Advisor/Consultant|AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|AbbVie: Honoraria|AstraZeneca: Advisor/Consultant|AstraZeneca: Grant/Research Support|AstraZeneca: Honoraria|Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences: Honoraria|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Honoraria|Indivior Canada: Advisor/Consultant|Indivior Canada: Grant/Research Support|Indivior Canada: Honoraria|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Honoraria|Moderna: Advisor/Consultant|Moderna: Grant/Research Support|Moderna: Honoraria|Sanofi Pasteur: Advisor/Consultant|Sanofi Pasteur: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi Pasteur: Honoraria|Seqirus: Advisor/Consultant|Seqirus: Grant/Research Support|Seqirus: Honoraria|ViiV Healthcare: Advisor/Consultant|ViiV Healthcare: Grant/Research Support|ViiV Healthcare: Honoraria V. Paul DiMondi, PharmD, GSK: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)|ViiV Healthcare: Employee

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentFrench-language works237,207