MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406946833 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1465

P-1284. Impact of Timing of Measles Vaccine Doses on IgG Levels

2025· article· en· W4406946833 on OpenAlexaffabout
Zineb Laghdir, Sophie Boissonneault, Annie St‐Pierre, Émilie Vallières, Caroline Quach

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVirology and Viral Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeaslesMeasles vaccineVirologyImmunologyVaccination

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Although measles was eliminated from Canada, recent outbreaks worldwide are increasing the risk of importation with local transmission. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are known to be at higher risk of measles, compared to the general population. Recent measles breakthrough infection in immune individuals have raised several questions about levels of immunity. We examined the proportion of HCWs who were considered seropositive for measles and evaluated factors associated with lower IgG levels. Methods Measles IgG were measured in a convenient sample of HCWs from the Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine (CHUSJ), a tertiary-care hospital, located in Montreal, Canada, in the context of an outbreak and the need to rapidly assess our workforce protection. Data from the Occupational Health clinic was used (age, vaccination history, sex). Sera were tested using LIAISON® Measles IgG (Diasorin) for quantitative measurement of measles-specific IgG. IgG levels > 16.5 IU/L were considered protective. Data were compared using the Welch’s t-test on Microsoft Excel. Results A total of 114 HCWs were tested. Of the 42 individuals born before 1970 without vaccination, 92.9% were considered protected with a mean IgG level of 239.07 IU/L (SD - 103). A total of 45 HCWs were born in 1970 or thereafter; of those 32 received two doses of vaccine, with a first dose received between 12 and 15 months of age. HCWs (n = 8) who received their second dose between 17 and up to 21 months of age had mean IgG titers of 71.38 IU/L (SD - 104). In comparison, the 24 HCWs who received their second dose after 21 months of age, at a mean age of 142.43 months (range [28,393]), had a mean IgG level of 177.12 IU/L (p = 0.03). Conclusion These results suggest that the second dose of measles vaccine administered at a later age is associated with a higher IgG level. The clinical impact of these higher IgG levels remains to be explored. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicVirology and Viral DiseasesFrench-language works237,207