MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406947375 · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3536362

5G Fronthaul in Modular P4: eCPRI Protocol Processing and Precise BMv2 Timestamps for PTP-1588

2025· article· en· W4406947375 on OpenAlexafffund
Atabak Nojavan, Bill Pontikakis, François-Raymond Boyer, Yvon Savaria

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkModular designTimestampProtocol (science)Operating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

P4, a domain-specific language (DSL) for programming network devices, offers flexibility in defining packet processing behaviors. This paper demonstrates the use of P4 to achieve modular eCPRI protocol processing and enhanced PTP-1588 synchronization, both critical for 5G fronthaul applications in Open Radio Access Network (O-RAN) environments. By implementing an eCPRI packet processing unit based on the eCPRI Specification Version 2 and inspired by Intel’s FPGA-based IP, we enable modular addition of new message types and custom packet processing functionality in P4. Our approach reduced lines of code per type by 85% and decreased configuration time by up to 5x compared to traditional methods, significantly simplifying complexity. Additionally, we introduce precise ingress and automatic egress timestamps for the BMv2 software switch to improve PTP-1588 accuracy, reducing error margins from 24,000 microseconds to 60 microseconds (99.75% improvement) and achieving sub-microsecond precision. Extensive testing in a Mininet environment validates these improvements, demonstrating enhanced precision and flexibility in handling time-sensitive protocols. While this paper focuses on 5G fronthaul applications in O-RAN networks, the techniques and results presented are equally applicable to other use cases across end-to-end 5G networks and beyond, paving the way for modular, high-precision, and programmable solutions in future open and interoperable network architectures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207