« Land <i>of</i> the dead », « Land <i>for</i> the dead », « deadlands » : approches théoriques de l’espace dans les oeuvres de la <i>zombie culture</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir d’une analyse de corpus filmique, textuel et graphique, cet article entend discuter les différentes dimensions spatiales qui se déclinent dans les oeuvres de la zombie culture depuis les années 1960 ainsi que les frontières qu’elles établissent entre le monde des humains et celui des morts, entre les contextes urbain et rural, entre le cimetière et la ville, entre espace souterrain et espace terrestre, mais aussi, de manière plus oblique, entre minorités et majorité. Les morts-vivants nourrissent d’autres allégories, sociales, cette fois, à travers les ondulations de l’espace (notamment urbain), entre le vide et le saturé de présence, entre l’inclusion/exclusion spatiale des vivants et des morts. Étant très mobiles, ils font saillir, à l’image des vivants qu’ils chassent, un rapport complexe et très déterminant à l’espace.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".