A Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy-sponsored International Workshop Report on Endocrine and Bone Issues in Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: An Ever-changing Landscape
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In April 2023, over 30 experts and advocates from four countries met in Rome, Italy to discuss unmet needs in endocrine and bone health care for individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Despite recent advances in muscle-targeted therapy, long-term glucocorticoids (GC) remain the backbone of treatment for the foreseeable future. This affirms the need to intensify efforts that will mitigate serious complications of GC therapy, including unexpected mortality due to fat embolism syndrome following bone injury and also unrecognized adrenal suppression, early loss of ambulation linked to excess weight and/or fragility fracture, adverse cardiometabolic effects of GC, the psychosocial impact of profound growth and pubertal delay/hypogonadism, and the burden to families arising from monitoring and treating endocrine and skeletal complications of GC therapy. Delegates discussed: 1. The impact of GC therapy on the heart, 2. Predictors of fragility fractures and experience with intravenous and oral bisphosphonates plus teriparatide, 3. The effect of hormonal therapy on muscle-bone health, 4. Adrenal suppression, 5. Weight management, 6. Puberty, sexuality, fertility and gender identity, 7. The impact of early GC initiation, 8. Emerging knowledge about vamorolone (a novel dissociative steroid) and its effects on muscle, bone and endocrine health, and 9. Experiences implementing an endocrine-bone health management strategy nation-wide (in the UK). At the conclusion of the meeting, it was agreed that an endocrine-bone working group should be struck to continue the narrative, following which the International OPTIMIZE DMD Consortium was ignited to move the dial in these important areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".