MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406957931 · doi:10.57185/hij.v3i1.46

Poor Outcome in an Elderly Patient with Generalized Tetanus During Hospitalization: Identifying Contributing Factors - A Case Report

2025· article· en· W4406957931 on OpenAlexaff
Iqbal Adi Prakoso, Anita Septiana Maria Kathrine, Muhammad Satri Delta Wijaya

Bibliographic record

VenueAl Makki Health Informatics Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus
Canadian institutionsRegina General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTetanusMedicineOutcome (game theory)PediatricsIntensive care medicineVaccinationMathematicsVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tetanus, caused by Clostridium tetani, remains a significant global health challenge despite the availability of vaccines. This case report discusses a 64-year-old male farmer diagnosed with Grade IV generalized tetanus following a puncture wound caused by a fish bone. The patient presented with stiffness, trismus, risus sardonicus, and opisthotonus, with symptoms progressively worsening. The diagnosis was established using Ablett's classification, and treatment included tetanus antitoxin, antibiotics, diazepam, and nutritional support. However, limited healthcare resources, inadequate isolation facilities, and a lack of essential medications contributed to a poor prognosis, culminating in the patient's death. This case emphasizes the critical need for improved healthcare infrastructure, early diagnosis, comprehensive management, and public health initiatives to prevent tetanus through vaccination and education. The findings highlight the importance of addressing systemic healthcare barriers to enhance outcomes in severe tetanus cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAl Makki Health Informatics JournalSame topicDiphtheria, Corynebacterium, and TetanusFrench-language works237,207