$\otimes$-Frobenius functors and exact module categories
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We call a tensor functor $F:\mathcal{C}\to\mathcal{D}$ between finite tensor categories $\otimes$-Frobenius if its left and right adjoints are isomorphic as $\mathcal{C}$-bimodule functors. We give several characterizations of this notion -- most notably, $F$ is $\otimes$-Frobenius if and only if the centralizer $Z({}_{F}\!{\mathcal{D}}_{\!F})$ is unimodular. We use them to analyze how actions on module categories behave under pullback along $F$. For perfect functors, we show that twisting a $\mathcal{D}$-module category $\mathcal{M}$ along $F$ preserves exactness, and that pivotality, unimodularity, and sphericality are preserved whenever $F$ is $\otimes$-Frobenius (or, more generally, Frobenius with respect to $\mathcal{M}$). Applications include: (i) explicit criteria for $\otimes$-Frobenius functors arising from bialgebra maps $f\!:\!H'\!\to\!H$ between finite-dimensional Hopf algebras; and (ii) criteria ensuring that objects of internal natural transformations are (symmetric) Frobenius algebras in $Z(\mathcal{C})$. Along the way we show that central tensor functors are Frobenius iff they are $\otimes$-Frobenius and that any tensor functor between separable fusion categories is $\otimes$-Frobenius, answering questions of Flake-Laugwitz-Posur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".