MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406962765 · doi:10.1161/str.56.suppl_1.tmp89

Abstract TMP89: Predictive Model of Ischemic Event Recurrence in Pediatric Moyamoya

2025· article· en· W4406962765 on OpenAlexaff
Matsanga Leyila Kaseka, Fatema Johara, Elizabeth Pulcine, Mahendranath Moharir, Eleanor Pullenayegum, Nomazulu Dlamini

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMoyamoya disease diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMoyamoya diseaseIschemic strokeEvent (particle physics)Stroke (engine)Internal medicineCardiologyPediatricsIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Moyamoya is a progressive cerebral arteriopathy and one of the leading causes of stroke recurrence in children. Clinical severity scores have been developed for adult patients given the multifaceted pathophysiology of moyamoya. However, these scores were not designed to assess the risk of ischemic event recurrence, and they have not been validated in children. Objective: To develop a predictive model of ischemic event recurrence adapted to pediatric moyamoya. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a single-center cohort of moyamoya patients, extracting demographic, clinical, and radiographic data. A binary logit mixed-effects regression was applied to predict ischemic event recurrence or disease progression based on this data. Variables were selected based on current literature. The model was validated using three approaches: validation, leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV), and 10-fold cross-validation, assessing performance via area under the curve (AUC), prediction accuracy, and binary classification entropy (BCE). Results: Two-hundred and twenty hemispheres were analyzed. Sixty-six hemispheres showed evidence of ischemic event recurrence or disease progression over a mean follow-up period of 6.23 ± 4.19 years. The median time to event was 21 months. Age at presentation (β=-0.036; p=0.48), Asian ancestry (β=1.74; p=0.002), asymptomatic presentation (β=1.084; p=0.207)), ischemic symptoms at presentation (β=2.15; p=0.011), evidence of infarction on initial brain MRI (β=-0.79; p=0.155), presence of an ivy sign (β=-0.2; p=0.67), unilateral disease (β=-0.97; p=0.077) with an intercept at β=-2.02 (p=0.052) were the variables included in the model. Computed model included LOOCV and 10-fold produced highest prediction accuracy (0.77 and 0.773 respectively), whereas 10-fold cross-validation had the smallest BCE value along with AUC=0.736. Conclusions: We present a pediatric-specific predictive model for the recurrence of ischemic events in moyamoya patients, demonstrating good accuracy. Our performance metrics indicate that 10-fold cross-validation is the preferred method for predicting moyamoya recurrence. This model provides a framework for developing a scoring scale that can be used in clinical practice to quantify risk and guide treatment decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicMoyamoya disease diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207