MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406965284 · doi:10.1063/5.0242803

Development of a novel high-frequency reciprocal structure fiber optical pulsed current sensor

2025· article· en· W4406965284 on OpenAlexaff
Zhiling Mao, Tao Lan, Ke Wang, Weixing Ding, Jie Wu, Qilong Dong, Yongkang Zhou, Wenzhe Mao, Zhengwei Wu, Jiaren Wu, Yiming Zu, Peng Deng, Pengcheng Lu, Zian Wei, Xiaohui Wen, Hai Wang, Chu Zhou, A. D. Liu, Jinlin Xie, Hong Li, Wandong Liu, C. Xiao, G. Zhuang

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMagneto-Optical Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMaterials scienceCurrent (fluid)ReciprocalOptical fiberOptoelectronicsFiberOpticsFiber optic sensorCurrent sensorPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel all-fiber optic current sensor (FOCS) is designed specifically for the measurement of large transient currents based on the Faraday effect. A reciprocal symmetric structure is incorporated into the optical sensing loop, and the current dependent phase demodulation is achieved by using a passive optical fiber coupler and the homodyne detection scheme. This design offers several advantages, including structural simplicity, high voltage insulation, low noise, high linearity, and excellent frequency response, and is highly suitable for use in any system of high-voltage, high-power, and high-frequency in nature. A current source based on fast capacitor discharge is used for the bench-test of the FOCS system, and several laser sources with different wavelengths and linewidths have been used to test the FOCS performance. Experimental results show that the phase noise of the laser is independent of both wavelength and linewidth. The sensitivity of the FOCS system has been calibrated against a commercial Rogowski current sensor. This FOCS offers precise and flexible high-current pulse measurements with a measured phase noise of 1.4 × 10-3 rad, using a 1550 nm laser with a 1 kHz linewidth. The fully reciprocal sensing loop ensures that the phase noise remains unchanged as the loop length increases. These features make the FOCS a robust and adaptable tool for high-precision current sensing in challenging environments. Finally, the FOCS system has consistently demonstrated its superior and stable performance in terms of high-frequency response and low noise with minimal dependence on the laser parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicMagneto-Optical Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207