MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406966072 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452567

Velocity shift of a C IV broad absorption line in quasar SDSS J145229.08+093204.9

2025· article· en· W4406966072 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Wei-Jian Lu, Ying-Ru Lin, Min-Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratorySmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryUniversity of Colorado BoulderOffice of ScienceMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoU.S. Department of EnergySmithsonian InstitutionNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of OxfordYork UniversityLeibniz-GemeinschaftUniversity of Notre DameInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasCarnegie Mellon UniversityUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoAlfred P. Sloan FoundationUniversity of WashingtonJohns Hopkins UniversityCarnegie Institution of WashingtonUniversity of UtahOhio State UniversityNatural Science Foundation of Guangxi ProvinceNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthVanderbilt UniversityYale UniversityMax-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik
KeywordsPhysicsQuasarAstrophysicsLine (geometry)Absorption (acoustics)Absorption spectroscopyRed shiftAstronomyMolecular absorptionSpectral lineEmission spectrumGalaxyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the observation of a velocity shift in the broad absorption line (BAL) of C IV ion in quasar SDSS J145229.08+093204.9 (hereafter J1452+0932).This quasar exhibits three distinct BAL systems, designated as systems A, B, and C. Notably, system A, which possesses the highest velocity of approximately −23 000 km s−1, demonstrates a velocity shift of −1097 km s−1 in its C IV ion over a rest-frame period of approximately 1.7 years. To elucidate the nature of these variations, we conducted a comprehensive analysis focusing on the variation situation, location, ionisation state, and profile shape of the three BAL systems in J1452+0932. Our findings reveal that system A is situated closer to the central source compared to systems B and C. Furthermore, system A exhibits higher velocities, higher ionisation states, and smoother profile morphologies. These characteristics collectively suggest that the outflow generating system A is situated in a particularly extreme environment and experiences more pronounced impacts from background radiation energy than systems B and C. Consequently, we postulate that the observed velocity shift in system A may signify an actual line-of-sight acceleration of the outflow, induced by the radiation pressure emanating from the central source. Specifically, this scenario could occur if our line of sight intersects an outflow at a location where it is undergoing acceleration towards its terminal outflow velocity, or if a previously coasting outflow is undergoing renewed acceleration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations→French-language works237,207→