MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406970321 · doi:10.1126/science.ads2659

The Sikkim flood of October 2023: Drivers, causes, and impacts of a multihazard cascade

2025· article· en· W4406970321 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ashim Sattar, Kristen Cook, Shashi Kant, Étienne Berthier, Simon Allen, Sonam Rinzin, Maximillian Van Wyk de Vries, Wilfried Haeberli, Pradeep Kushwaha, Dan H. Shugar, Adam Emmer, Umesh K. Haritashya, Holger Frey, Kori Sanjay Kumar Gurudin, Rajeev Rajak, Faruk Hossain, Christian Huggel, Martin Mergili, Mohd Farooq Azam, Simon Gascoin, Jonathan L. Carrivick, Rakesh Kumar Ranjan, Irfan Rashid, Anil V. Kulkarni, David N. Petley, Wolfgang Schwanghart, C. Scott Watson, Nazimul Islam, M Gupta, Stuart N. Lane, Shahid Younis Bhat

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesAlberta InnovatesIsaac Newton TrustMinistry of Earth SciencesDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
KeywordsHydropowerFlood mythMoraineClimate changeWater resource managementGeographyHydrology (agriculture)Environmental sciencePhysical geographyGeologyGlacierOceanographyEcologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On 3 October 2023, a multihazard cascade in the Sikkim Himalaya, India, was triggered by 14.7 million cubic meters of frozen lateral moraine collapsing into South Lhonak Lake. The impact generated an ~20-meter tsunami-like impact wave, which breached the moraine and drained ~50 million cubic meters of the lake's water. The ensuing glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) eroded ~270 million cubic meters of sediment, which overwhelmed infrastructure, including hydropower installations along the Teesta River. The physical scale and human and economic impacts of this event prompt urgent reflection on the role of climate change and human activities in exacerbating such disasters. Insights into multihazard evolution are pivotal for informing policy development, enhancing early warning systems (EWS), and spurring paradigm shifts in GLOF risk management strategies in the Himalaya and other mountain environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations110
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScienceSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207