MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406972075 · doi:10.1080/10920277.2024.2442416

A Nested GLM Framework with Neural Network Encoding and Spatially Constrained Clustering in Non-Life Insurance Ratemaking

2025· article· en· W4406972075 on OpenAlexafffund
Haolun Shi, Jiguo Cao

Bibliographic record

VenueNorth American Actuarial Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCluster analysisArtificial neural networkGeneralized linear modelEconometricsComputer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The generalized linear model (GLM) is a popular modeling choice for pricing non-life insurance policies. However, high-cardinality categorical insurance data presents significant challenges for these GLM rate-making models. Additionally, insurance regulators often require rating territories, which are clusters of insurance policies’ geographic locations for setting insurance rates, to meet certain standards. For instance, (1) the credibility standard ensures that the number of policies in a territory is large enough to be credible and representative, (2) the contiguity standard requires the locations in each territory to be geographically adjacent to promote a logical and practical spatial grouping, and (3) the cardinality standard specifies an acceptable range for the number of territories in a geographic area. To address these challenges, this article proposes a nested GLM framework for non-life insurance rate-making applications. In this framework, neural network models with categorical embedding layers are constructed to model the residual deviance from simple GLMs, using high-cardinality categorical variables as input. Low-dimensionly features extracted from the neural network model effectively translate categorical variables into meaningful numerical representations, capturing their effects on the initial model’s residuals. The features corresponding to the location-related variable are further converted into a contiguous territory rating variable via spatially constrained clustering models. By incorporating outcomes from these models, the nested GLM not only satisfies regulatory requirements but also enhances the model’s predictive power, while maintaining the interpretability from the (generalized) linear form. The construction of a nested Poisson GLM is presented in this article. Its performance is demonstrated using a real-life Brazil auto insurance data to model claim frequency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorth American Actuarial JournalSame topicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207