MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406972388 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2024-0189

Measurements of turbulence characteristics in a warped transition

2025· article· en· W4406972388 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
S. Samuel Li, Behzad Lak

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTurbulenceMechanicsK-epsilon turbulence modelStatistical physicsK-omega turbulence modelMeteorologyPhysicsEnvironmental scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transitions are needed to connect open-channel sections of different shapes and sizes that commonly exist in water supply channels, hydropower channels, irrigation canals and so on. A warped transition (WT) smoothly connects a rectangular channel-section with a trapezoidal one and is considered the most efficient transition type with the least flow separation. This paper aims to experimentally investigate the turbulence characteristics in the WT. It reports acoustic Doppler velocimetry measurements of fluctuations in turbulence intensity, kinetic energy and shear stress, as well as of the stationary flow field. The fluctuations are significant and entirely result from the influence of the transition. In the transition, the turbulence features a small jet-like core and reversed flows along one sidewall outside this core; even laterally averaged velocities have complicated vertical structures. This paper contributes to new benchmark turbulence conditions, useful for assessing the effectiveness of turbulence control devices and validating numerical models of turbulent flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering→Same topicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes→French-language works237,207→