‘Unsportsmanlike Behaviour’: Okigwe Football League and Inter-Community Rivalries in Southeastern Nigeria, 1949–1951
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On November 28, 1948, the Enugu office of the United African Company Limited received a request from Dr. Carl Wilson to donate a silver challenge cup to the Okigwe district on his behalf. Dr. Wilson had previously pledged to W.O. Okoro of Ihube town, Okigwe district, that he would provide the district with a cup to facilitate the organization of a league akin to those established in other regions of colonial Nigeria. Subsequently, in January 1949, the Okigwe district officer received the cup and initiated plans to develop the Okigwe Football League, which came to fruition in March of the same year. The dynamics of the Okigwe Football League from 1949 to 1951 are examined by drawing from previously unexploited archival documents and anthropological essays. The intricate interplay between sporting activities and inter-community rivalries characterizes the league’s history. The broader socio-political landscape of the league and how existing animosities influenced its development contribute a fresh perspective to the history of sports in colonial Nigeria. From contentious referee decisions to team protests and interventions by colonial authorities, the Okigwe Football League emerges as a microcosm reflecting the complexities of colonial sporting engagements and local power dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".