MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406978433 · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.01.031

Cutting across the curb – A review of recent developments in municipal curb management policy in America and Canada

2025· review· en· W4406978433 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransport Policy · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Parking Systems Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity at BuffaloSchool of Architecture and Planning, University at Buffalo
KeywordsEnvironmental planningPolitical scienceBusinessRegional scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The curb is perhaps the most complex and dynamic space within the urban street right-of-way. With the rise of urban freight, ride-hailing, cycling, outdoor dining and other uses, competition for curb space is increasing. In response to this pressure for space, municipalities are developing new policies to manage these demands. To inform this new policy development, this research focuses on analyzing the content of 26 recent curb management policies from American and Canadian municipalities. Specifically questioning to what extent the policies: identify the range of potential uses of the curb; recognize the competing interests; and/or acknowledge the dynamic nature of demand for curb space? We find that policies are rethinking the use of the curb beyond parking and are clearly seeking to manage demand for: urban freight, ride-hailing, and transit. Despite these policy innovations, there are opportunities to improve considerations for: bicycle accommodation; outdoor dining; mobility challenges; emergency services; utilities, and equity and inclusion among curb. Our research findings are limited to the analysis of existing curb management policies in America and Canada. Further research could explore how policies are operationalized, how streets are reconfigured, and how other similar municipal policies relate to curb management. Planning and transportation practitioners are uniquely positioned to bridge divides between competing interests and find equitable solutions for managing the curb. • Recent curb management policies are primarily conceptualized to address the increased demand for freight and delivery; pick-up and drop-off for ride-hailing; and technology integration. • In identifying the range of curb uses addressed in policies we find that: freight and delivery; pick-up and drop-off for ride-hailing; technology integration; and transit accommodations are addressed in the majority of recent policies. • There is much to be learned from the recent policy development, and hundreds of cities are interested in curb management strategies. • The siloed nature of municipal governance will continue to pose a substantial challenge for developing holistic curb management policies and strategies for their implementation especially with regard to negotiating between conflicting uses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it