MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406978673 · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116445

Pediment formation and subsequent erosion in Gale crater: Clues to the climate history of Mars

2025· article· en· W4406978673 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Bryk, W. E. Dietrich, K. A. Bennett, V. K. Fox, C. Fedo, Michael P. Lamb, Edwin S. Kite, L. M. Thompson, Steven G. Banham, Jüergen Schieber, J. A. Grant, A. R. Vasavada, A. A. Fraeman, L. A. Edgar, P. J. Gasda, R. C. Wiens, J. P. Grotzinger, K. Stack-Morgan, R. E. Arvidson, O. Gasnault, Stéphane Le Mouëlic, Sanjeev Gupta, R. M. E. Williams, Rachel Y. Sheppard, K. W. Lewis, David M. Rubin, W. Rapin, M. N. Hughes, Madison Turner, Sharon A. Wilson, J. M. Davis, R. E. Kronyak, L. Le Deit, Linda C. Kah, J. Frydenvang, R. Sullivan, C. C. Bedford, E. Dehouck, H. E. Newsom, M. C. Malin

Bibliographic record

VenueIcarus · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersJet Propulsion LaboratoryNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsImpact craterMars Exploration ProgramAstrobiologyGeologyErosionAeolian processesEarth scienceGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Evidence of paleo-rivers, fans, deltas, lakes, and channel networks across Mars has prompted much debate about what climate conditions would permit the formation of these surface water derived features. Pediments, gently sloping erosional surfaces of low relief developed in bedrock, have also been identified on Mars. On Earth, these erosional landforms, often thought to be created by overland flow and shallow channelized runoff, are typically capped by fluvial sediments, and thus in exceptionally arid regions, pediments are interpreted to record past wet periods. Here we document the Greenheugh pediment in Gale crater, exploiting the observational capability of the Curiosity rover. The absence of a fluvial cap suggests that the pediment was likely cut by wind erosion, not fluvial processes. The pediment was then buried by an aeolian deposit (Stimson sandstone) that mantled the lower footslopes of Aeolis Mons (informally known as Mt. Sharp). This burial terminated active wind erosion, preserving the pediment surface (as an angular unconformity). Groundwater was present prior-to, during, and shortly after Stimson deposition, perhaps contributing to lithification and certainly to early diagenesis. Post lithification, wind erosion first cut canyons in the northern most footslopes (north of Vera Rubin ridge). Unlithified gravels were deposited in these canyons, likely due to runoff from Mt. Sharp. Boulder-rich fluvial and debris flow deposits built a > 70 m thick sequence (Gediz Vallis ridge) on the southern Greenheugh pediment. Continued wind erosion left elevated patches of gravel on the northern footslopes, and exposure age dating shows that erosion essentially ceased before 1 Ga (but possibly much earlier). Erosion to the south led to emergence of Vera Rubin ridge, retreat of the Greenheugh pediment, and the formation of Glen Torridon valley. Hence, this footslope environment of Mt. Sharp records climate-driven periods of wind erosion, aeolian deposition (and groundwater activity), surface runoff and sediment deposition, followed by further significant wind erosion that declined to present very slow rates. This likely occurred during the late Hesperian and possibly into the Amazonian. • The Greenheugh pediment in Gale crater was likely eroded by aeolian processes. • Pedimentation on Mars does not require fluvial erosion as is commonly assumed on Earth. • Erosion of Mt. Sharp likely proceeded from North to South. • The unconformity and surrounding bedrock include evidence for multiple phases of liquid water. • These results support a slow decline in atmospheric density punctuated by obliquity driven times of hydrogeomorphic activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIcarusSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207