Optimization of Rate-Splitting Multiple Access With Integrated Sensing and Backscatter Communication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An integrated sensing and backscatter communication (ISABC) system is introduced herein. This system features a full-duplex (FD) base station (BS) that seamlessly merges sensing with backscatter communication and supports multiple users. Multiple access (MA) for the user is provided by employing rate-splitting multiple access (RSMA). RSMA, unlike other classical orthogonal and non-orthogonal MA schemes, splits messages into common and private streams. With RSMA, the set of common rate forms can be optimized to reduce interference. Optimized formulas are thus derived for communication rates for users, tags, and the BS's sensing rate, with the primary goal of enhancing the transmission efficiency of the BS. The optimization task involves minimizing the BS's overall transmission power by jointly optimizing the BS's beamforming vectors, the tag reflection coefficients, and user common rates. The alternating optimization method is employed to address this challenge. Concrete solutions are provided for the received beamformers, and semi-definite relaxation and slack-optimization techniques are adopted for transmit beamformers and reflection coefficients, respectively. For example, the proposed RSMA-assisted ISABC system achieves a 84.5% communication rate boost over a non-orthogonal multiple access-assisted ISABC, with only a 24% increase in transmit power, leveraging ten transmit/reception antennas at the BS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".