MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406983297 · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3537536

A Near-Zero Energy Smart Greenhouse Integrated Into a Microgrid for Sustainable Energy and Microclimate Management

2025· article· en· W4406983297 on OpenAlexafffund
Ahmed Ouammi, Louis A-Dessaint

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMicroclimateMicrogridEnergy managementZero-energy buildingGreenhouseZero (linguistics)Energy (signal processing)Greenhouse gasSustainable energyEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEnvironmental economicsEnergy conservationRenewable energyElectrical engineeringEngineeringEcologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel smart greenhouse integrated into a microgrid (SGIM) designed to optimize energy and microclimate management for sustainable agriculture. The SGIM integrates photovoltaic (PV) panels, a micro-combined heat and power (micro-CHP) unit, and an energy storage system to deliver efficient, localized energy generation and management. Within this framework, a Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (NMPC) and an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) are employed to regulate critical microclimate parameters such as temperature, relative humidity, CO2 concentration, and lighting intensity, while optimally managing energy storage to reduce grid power imports. The NMPC minimizes a cost function encompassing multiple objectives and constraints, whereas the EKF enhances control precision by addressing measurement errors and model noise. Simulations revealed that the SGIM met over 83% of its energy needs through local generation, with only 3.8% sourced from the external grid. This approach offers an effective solution for achieving near-zero energy consumption in sustainable agriculture, with scalability for various greenhouse types and sizes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score0.500

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicGreenhouse Technology and Climate ControlFrench-language works237,207