MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406992394 · doi:10.1161/str.56.suppl_1.tmp30

Abstract TMP30: Combining the Los Angeles Motor Scale and the Muse Portable Electroencephalography System Improves the Accuracy of Large Vessel Occlusion Detection in Acute Stroke Syndrome.

2025· article· en· W4406992394 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mahesh Kate, Jeyaram Thangeswaran, Geetha Charan Duba, Noman Ishaque, Sibi Thirunavukkarasu, Cassandra M. Wilkinson, Kyle E. Mathewson, Brian Buck

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsMacEwan UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineElectroencephalographyStroke (engine)OcclusionAcute strokePhysical medicine and rehabilitationCardiologyInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The prehospital scales have been developed to identify stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) to facilitate rapid transport to appropriate stroke centres. In practice, these stroke scales have moderate accuracy. There is a pressing need for adjunct easy-to-use and interpret diagnostic devices to improve prehospital stroke diagnosis and LVO detection. We aim to determine whether a machine learning algorithm using adjunct electroencephalography (EEG) Spectra can improve the accuracy of LVO detection Methods: Adult patients with suspected acute stroke were prospectively enrolled as soon as possible on arrival at the emergency department. A wearable Muse TM headband (InteraXon Inc, Canada) with an embedded 4-channel EEG was used for a resting 3-minute recording. EEG Spectra including relative alpha, beta, theta and delta spectral powers, delta-alpha ratio (DAR) and pairwise-derived brain symmetry indices (pdBSI) were calculated. These indices were compared between patients with LVO and non-LVO groups. The accuracy of LVO detection was tested with the aid of supervised machine learning(ML) algorithms including EEG Spectra, Los Angeles Motor Stroke Scale (LAMS), sex and side of stroke. Results: A total of 142 patients were included in the analysis with a mean age of 69.6±13.7 years, 60(42.2%) females, (Stroke Subtype:113[79.6%] were ischemic stroke, 22[15.5%] stroke mimics, 7[4.9%] intracerebral hemorrhage) and median NIHSS 5(2-11). Thirty-seven(26.1%) patients had LVO and EEG was acquired at a median of 6h 45m (3h 29m - 14h 15m) after symptom onset. Relative alpha spectral power was lower in both affected (p<0.0001) and unaffected hemispheres (p<0.0001) in the LVO group (Figure 1); there was no difference in the median affected hemisphere DAR (p=0.4). However, the median unaffected hemisphere DAR was higher in the LVO group compared to the no-LVO group (p=0.03) (Figure 2). The Support vector machine-based ML algorithm accuracy for detecting LVO was: 0.6 for clinical assessment (LAMS+ Side of deficit+ Sex) alone, 0.73 for EEG Spectra alone and 0.93 for clinical assessment + EEG Spectra (0.9 Sensitivity; 0.95, Positive Predictive value) Conclusion: Combining QEEG with clinical assessment significantly improves the overall accuracy of LVO detection versus LAMS alone in patients presenting with acute stroke syndrome. Future studies are ongoing to determine if a short EEG acquisition in the prehospital phase is useful for rapid triage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces→French-language works237,207→