Induksi Tunas Anggrek (Dendrobium taurinum) Secara In Vitro Dengan Penambahan Naphatale Acetid Acid (NAA) Dan Benzyl Amino Purin (BAP)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Orchids are part of the Orchidaceae family, which holds high ecological and economic value, particularly Dendrobium, which is highly sought after in the market. This study aims to induce shoots of Dendrobium taurinum orchids in vitro using the addition of Naphthalene Acetic Acid (NAA) and Benzyl Amino Purin (BAP). In this research, experiments were conducted using a Factorial Completely Randomized Design (CRD), involving different concentrations of NAA and BAP. The results indicate that the addition of NAA and BAP significantly affects the number of shoots produced, with the combination of 0.5 ppm NAA and 0.5 ppm BAP yielding the best results. Furthermore, the percentage of viable plantlets also showed satisfactory results, reaching 100% in several treatments. This research is expected to provide new insights into more efficient and quality orchid propagation techniques, and contribute to the development of more productive and profitable orchid cultivation for farmers and the floriculture industry
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".