STICI: Split-Transformer with integrated convolutions for genotype imputation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite advances in sequencing technologies, genome-scale datasets often contain missing bases and genomic segments, hindering downstream analyses. Genotype imputation addresses this issue and has been a cornerstone pre-processing step in genetic and genomic studies. Although various methods have been widely adopted for genotype imputation, it remains challenging to impute certain genomic regions and large structural variants. Here, we present a transformer-based framework, named STICI, for accurate genotype imputation. STICI models automatically learn genome-wide patterns of linkage disequilibrium, evidenced by much higher imputation accuracy in regions with highly linked variants. Our imputation results on the human 1000 Genomes Project and non-human genomes show that STICI can achieve high imputation accuracy comparable to the state-of-the-art genotype imputation methods, with the additional capability to impute multi-allelic variants and various types of genetic variants. STICI can be trained for any collection of genomes automatically using self-supervision. Moreover, STICI shows excellent performance without needing any special presuppositions about the underlying patterns in collections of non-human genomes, pointing to adaptability and applications of STICI to impute missing genotypes in any species. Genome-scale genotyping datasets often contain missing data that negatively affects downstream analysis. Here, authors propose a genotype imputation method based on a Transformer framework that excels at imputing missing genotypes of genetic variants in various scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".